Comparison of enoxaparin 40 mg versus 60 mg dosage for venous thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Morbid obesity is an independent risk factor for VTE, with goals of prophylactic anti-factor Xa levels within 0.2-0.5 IU/mL. The recommended dosing regimen of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in patients with morbid obesity is lacking in available guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the achieving prophylactic anti-factor Xa levels with different dosages of enoxaparin for morbid obesity patients. SETTING: We conducted a study at Chulalongkorn Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing anti-factor Xa levels 4 h after the administration of enoxaparin. All recruited patients randomly received 40 mg or 60 mg of enoxaparin 12 h before the operation. Blood specimens were collected 4 h after the administration of enoxaparin. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients who presented between April 2019 and March 2020 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were recruited. Of these patients, 28 received 40 mg and 28 received 60 mg of enoxaparin. In both groups, the rates of achieving target levels were 53.57% and 78.57%, respectively (p-value = 0.048). The mean anti-factor Xa levels were 0.19 IU/mL ± 0.06 IU/mL and 0.28 and 0.28 ± 0.10 IU/mL, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the estimated blood loss between the groups. No patient obtained anti-factor Xa levels exceeding 0.5 IU/mL. In both groups, no symptomatic VTE occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A 60 mg of enoxaparin regimen achieved more prophylactic anti-factor Xa levels than 40 mg in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery without any adverse events.

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery for Morbidly Obese with Diabetes Patients in Thailand.

Background: Bariatric surgery is a choice for treatment in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM type 2) who have inadequate diabetes control with only medical treatment. However, bariatric surgery requires highly sophisticated equipment, and thus the cost of surgery seems to be very high following the procedure compared with the cost of conventional diabetes care. This raises the question of whether bariatric surgery is cost-effective for morbidly obese people with diabetes in Thailand. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation of bariatric surgery compared with ordinary treatment for diabetes control in morbidly obese DM type 2 patients in Thailand. Methods: Cost-effectiveness study was conducted, using a combination of decision tree and Markov model in analysis. Treatment outcomes and healthcare costs were incurred by data from literature review and retrospective cohort in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from September 2009 to March 2016 for the conventional and bariatric surgery group, respectively. One-way sensitivity was used for analysis of the robustness of the model. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Monetary benefits at a threshold of 150,000 to 200,000 Thai baht (THB) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) based on the Thailand gross domestic products (GDP) value was regarded as cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery. Results: Bariatric surgery significantly improves the clinical outcome including long-term diabetes remission rate, hemoglobin A1C, and body mass index (BMI). The incremental cost per QALY of bariatric surgery compared with the medication control is 26,907.76 THB/QALY which can consider bariatric surgery as a cost-effective option. Conclusions: Use of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese with DM type 2 patients is a cost-effective strategy in Thailand's context.

Induced Hypothermia in a Penetrating Trauma Patient with Cardiac Arrest from Exsanguination: The First Case Report.

The authors report the use of induced hypothermia in a stab wound patient with left common femoral artery injury who had cardiac arrest from exsanguination immediately after arriving at a private hospital. The patient was transferred to the authors' institution (a university hospital) after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation, for vascular repair. The patient remained comatose five hours after the vascular repair. The induced hypothermia (target body temperature of 33°C) was initiated 10 hours post arrest after the bleeding control and physiologic derangement restoration had been achieved. The patient recovered uneventfully with good neurological outcome.